Hormuz Strait Blockade
IRGC Says Hormuz Strait Stays Closed Until U.S. Meets All Tehran Conditions
On August 9, 2026, Iran's Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) spokesman Hossein Mohebi stated on state television that the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until the United States accepts all of Tehran's conditions. He said the waterway is now a 'theatre of war.'
The IRGC has maintained an effective blockade of the strait since late February 2026 following U.S. and Israeli attacks. Tehran intends to retain control over the corridor to charge transit tolls and has carried out strikes against vessels attempting to bypass its preferred route.
The spokesperson's statement follows a list of demands issued on August 8, 2026, by Iran's security chief Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr. The list includes an end to aggression against Iran and its allies in Lebanon, Palestine, Yemen, and Iraq.
The IRGC maintains the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz until the United States meets Tehran's demands.
More News
Maritime disruptions drive up global trade costs, put pressure on global economy
On August 9, 2026, global shipping routes and trade corridors faced severe cost increases due to ongoing military and security tensions.
In the Black Sea, Russian and Ukrainian attacks drove war-risk insurance premiums to between 1% and 2% of a vessel's value. Ukrainian port capacity fell to 4 million tons per month, down from 6 million tons, and 57 commercial ships were hit in a single month.
In the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandeb Strait, Houthi attacks forced shipping companies to bypass the Suez Canal and reroute around the Cape of Good Hope. Suez Canal traffic dropped 60% to 64%, with weekly transits falling from 250 to fewer than 100.
In the Strait of Hormuz, average daily vessel traffic plunged from 130–140 to 4–8 ships since the start of the U.S.-Israeli-Iranian conflict in late February 2026. Crude oil flows dropped from 11.9 million barrels per day to 1.7 million barrels per day.
The World Bank warned that these persistent disruptions could increase inflation and weaken global growth, forecasting global growth of 2.5% and inflation around 4% in 2026.
ZIM Updates New Bunker Factor (NBF) Effective September 1, 2026
On August 9, 2026, international container shipping line ZIM announced an update to its New Bunker Factor (NBF) surcharge.
The updated rates are scheduled to take effect on September 1, 2026, applying across all countries in ZIM's global shipping network.
Expert Outlook
Core judgment
With only a C-grade ZIM NBF update and no China–Mexico FCL policy, port, or customs material this period, the structural pattern is routine carrier cost-pass-through rather than a rules or chokepoint regime shift for Mexican FCL importers. The August 9 announcement sets a September 1, 2026 network-wide effective date; published tables show mixed, mostly lower per-TEU NBF levels versus the prior July 1 schedule on the listed trades, none of which is explicitly China–Mexico. Any landed-cost effect therefore remains conditional on whether ZIM is used and whether the applicable factor for the actual routing is higher or lower than the prior schedule.
Drivers decoded
Hard fact: on August 9, 2026 ZIM announced an update to its New Bunker Factor surcharge, effective September 1, 2026 across all countries in its global network, with published per-TEU levels that revise the previous schedule effective July 1, 2026. Soft signal: the move is a scheduled commercial maintenance of the bunker recovery factor rather than an emergency fee or a keyword shift from temporary to permanent language. Pushing the interest–leverage–mindset frame for the only player in the skeleton—ship lines (ZIM)—the interest is to protect bunker-cost recovery and yield through a pre-announced schedule; the leverage is a network-wide NBF that can attach to any ZIM lifting, including China–Mexico FCL if that routing is used; the mindset is routine periodic maintenance with a clear September 1 effective date. No other players (Mexican importers as a class, ANAM/SAT, or U.S. trade agencies) show new actions in the evidence set, so the game remains a unilateral carrier pricing update.
Chain effects
The sole confirmed transmission is from ZIM’s network-wide NBF schedule revision into the bunker-related line-charge component of any FCL booking that uses ZIM. On the published tables, several Asia–Europe and Mediterranean–Americas legs move lower versus the July 1 schedule (for example China–Mediterranean/Europe from $850 to $843/TEU; Mediterranean & North Europe to/from North America, Central America, Caribbean & West Coast South America from $380 to $325/TEU). No China–Mexico-specific NBF line is listed, so any landed-cost change for Mexican FCL importers remains second-order and conditional on whether the actual routing falls under a published leg that has changed and whether ZIM is the carrier of record. There is no first-order policy, port, or customs transmission in the period set. Winners are limited to ZIM customers whose applicable NBF factor declines or stays flat; there is no broad winner or loser class among Mexican FCL importers as a group, and no offsetting ANAM/SAT or trade-policy relief appears in the current evidence.
Scenarios and signposts
Still open: whether ZIM’s published NBF tables or circulars map any listed leg explicitly onto the China–Mexico FCL routings used by mid/large Mexican importers; whether peer carriers issue matching bunker-factor revisions for Asia–Mexico or Transpacific–Mexico FCL services in the next 7–30 days; and any ANAM/SAT or Mexican trade-policy notice that would interact with line surcharges (none in the current set). Confirmed: the NBF update was announced August 9, 2026 and is scheduled to take effect September 1, 2026 network-wide; the published per-TEU levels versus the prior July 1 schedule include China to Mediterranean/Black Sea & Europe at $843 (was $850), Far East excluding China to the same at $793 (unchanged), Mediterranean & North Europe to/from North America, Central America, Caribbean & West Coast South America at $325 (was $380), and several other listed trades mostly lower or flat—no China–Mexico line is published.
Baseline (high likelihood): September 1 proceeds as announced; China–Mexico FCL landed cost for ZIM users may adjust only to the extent the new factor on the actual routing differs from the prior schedule, with no broader policy or port disruption evidenced.
Optimistic (possible): if the applicable NBF for the relevant leg is flat or lower, ZIM-using Mexican FCL importers see limited or no bunker-related cost increase at the effective date.
Pessimistic (possible): if the applicable NBF on ZIM services that lift China–Mexico FCL is higher than the prior schedule, those importers face higher bunker-related line charges from September 1 with no offsetting policy relief in the current set.
Need Logistics? Get a Quote
End-to-end China-to-LATAM logistics. Get competitive rates now.
Get a Quote